Rogue HCI Guy
@roguehci
Your friendly shitposting scientist, here to disappoint your biases. It's never personal. Topics: ITsec, psych, engineering, data science, coding, politics. German/English/Japanese/Dutch (in progress).
The goblin shark would like to have a word about your definition of "demon".
Doing some random research about beavers and found this from 1992. I think this is how we should treat pvalues. No shame, if it's ~5% then it's significant. No "trending towards" bs, no fake "hard cutoffs". Be humble, but, you know, who cares if it's 4.9 or 5.1.
Maximise your QRPs by following this simple list. Also it might be a poem of some sort.
Proof of concept. "How old are you in years": let 7 participants have their birthdays in the trial period. Age mean shifts by ~0.2, SD drops. "State your year of birth" would produce stable results regardless of birthdays.
Peer Review: broken Tenure: enables power abuse Journals: corporate Incentives: p < .05, money, "novelty", "prestige" Language: elitist Conferences: in-person Pay: low Accessibility: mostly networking Outward communication: marginal Long-term out-of-tenure-positions: inexistent Academia:
Wenn du die Post-Doc Zeit verkürzt, bleiben nur die Stressresistenten. Die Klügsten gehen.
Ich sage nur: das war so in meiner Timeline zu sehen und ich mache mir Gedanken
This means "Boomers are dying". And it also means nothing will change in terms of society. Rich will stay rich, poor will stay poor. No trickling, no movement, classes are preserved.
Lockbit apparently down. Let's see what tomorrow holds. Screenshot by Brian Krebs.