Running Dog
@runningdog
In the early days of our movement, it was mandatory that all members smoke cigarettes and refrain from speaking, but we realized those traditions were stupid. He/him/his/bark
In my experience you need to work quite hard not to notice somebody drinking as much as Coyle says he was on a regular basis. Yet we’re encouraged to believe MPs and hacks saw nothing amiss until he racially abused a journalist.
Here Sky News’s savviest scoop-getter captures the whole phenomenon - promising nice things after decades of shit, then immediately admitting the only things on offer are just as bad & probably even worse shit actually. The verdict: probably quite disappointing
Intensely distilled political commentary this week, as Beth and Harriet first spend 10 minutes fretting that The Good Man Keir Starmer’s fall shows the uk is literally impossible to govern, then another 10 sighing that he was shit at politics and also didn’t do anything to make people like him
Testing the outer boundaries of radical government by having the same people, but some of them in different jobs
Look I know the hacks are all on crack right now, but it isn’t a giant bin, is it. It’s a man in a silly costume
Helen explains that Burnham should simply put up income tax immediately. A panel of the UK’s finest scrutineers agree that yes, “if we don’t do this, Russia will invade the UK” is a very compelling argument
Ian is annoyed that Starmer’s being forced out just when things are starting to go great, such as net migration falling - an achievement with presumably no downsides
On the Private Eye podcast, leading satirists & dogged holding-to-accounters Ian and Helen choose to own Stop Brexit Man by explaining how much Starmer likes peaceful protest 🤔
Imagine, right at the end, still insisting that “work+competence” in a management job and 3 ways of saying “making people do things” are completely different sets of skills
“People want…tax loopholes” is a fun new one. Did Big Farmer spoil an otherwise flawless growth strategy
Trend is Reform have no ground game & if hacks are obliged to look closely at reform candidates they’ll grudgingly do it. Few lessons for a G.E. where hacks couldn’t focus on all the candidates even if they wanted to, & they won’t want to anyway because they’ll be obsessing about Some Bullshit
Not to be all “start guillotining newspaper editors and don’t stop til the situation improves”, but like, there’s a powerful narrative that welfare is exclusively for scroungers. It might be naive, but believing the media is not deliberately lying to you, is how society is supposed to work
Ukraine shares a long border with a Russia so they’re fighting with drones on the ground. The first question about the UK investing in drones to fight “a future Ukraine-style war” is: what the fuck are you talking about
Very funny how the plain-speaking great white hopes of Labour manage to communicate absolutely nothing in a way that appeals to nobody
Let’s be serious. What politician *anywhere* is going out saying “time to tighten our belts lads, because [unspecified future war]”. Literally who is going to do that. If a “strategic defence review” says “two year national conversation” does that suggest they know what the fuck they’re doing.
You can tell MPs are confident about their definitely-real plans when they’re announcing them to Matt Forde on a semi-exclusive basis
[me and all the other Economist guys shaking our damn heads at our incredibly serious analysis] the fuckin’ kids these days are all me-me-me, they don’t even want to seize the means of production
Mate you’re the political editor of Sky News. According to the Sky website you have a team of 8 correspondents and a deputy. If you’re doing your politics homework on the bus because theres too much politics going on, that is very much a you problem.
Idk man, “there are 500 political hacks now and they’re texting MPs all day” is not the defence against “the media is creating chaos” you may think it is
Do the voters like it, Jonathan. Is that what the uh analytically useful data shows
Come on man, the lobby hacks would skip through a field of land mines if somebody said there was a Rare Intervention from Tony Blair press release on the other side. Let’s not fuck around here
Hearing Burnham has been convinced that he had to run for this seat to prove a point, and contesting this seat means shredding anything he might actually like or believe in or know is popular. Another tremendous win for the Labour Right, the UK’s most Sensible & Winning-est Faction
Idk man, does “companies would rather just hire a receptionist than try to Frankenstein it with AI” prove anything at all. Like presumably it doesn’t take account of all the companies who replaced receptionists with a voice menu and a sign 20-30 years ago