Emma □ feet

@scary-lil-emma

Something, something, all my own views, etc. etc. - no DMs - dyslexic, so excuse the typos & dropped words 😅 (She/her 🏳️‍⚧️ 💗💜💙/ 💛💜💛)

793 Folgt665 Follower1.532 Posts

YouTube YouTube YouTube Bluesky

feet

Ist das dein Profil?Übernimm es — dann gehört dir scary-lil-emma.dirty.social.Profil übernehmen

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jul 15

These are current Labour MPs proudly stabding up for Gender Critical ideology & showing their support for corrupting & abolishing UK citizens human rights. All in the name of transphobia While openly trying to attack Amnesty International for calling out anti-rights "charities" & organisations.

Antoniazzi, Tonia
>
Labour
14Jull 002
Gower Primary
Gilbert, Tracy
>
Labour
14July 0026 Edinburgh North and Leith
Smith, David
>
Labour
14July 2026
North Nortumberland
Sullivan, Kirsteen
>
Labour
14JJuyy 026
Bathgate and Linlithgow
Glindon, Mary Labour

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 27

youtube.com/shorts/M0QBP...

Human Rights Council
Sixty-second session

"The essence of childhood has been destroyed": Israel's deliberate targeting of Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory since 7 October 2023

Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 26

Hmm 🤔 Maybe reply with this & ask where did they get their information from?

Vera Baird: What are the specific exceptions that you are worried about?
Q74 Dr Harris: For example, in Schedule 9 there is the ability of a religious organisation to discriminate, so they could say, "We will allow a woman priest", that is if they had women priests-
Vera Baird: There are not many of them.
Q75 Dr Harris: Yes, indeed, but let us say they did, "But we are not going to allow a woman priest who is in possession of a Gende Recognition Certificate, who is a woman". They would argue that is a permitted exception under gender reassignment. Is that a clash with the sex discrimination provisions?
/era Baird: Is that right? She is a woman now for all purposes, not a transgender person, a woman.
Q76 Dr Harris: Right
Vera Baird: That is the point of the certificate, is it not, to make it lear beyond doubt and that is where all her rights come from
277 Dr Harris: So what you are saying is someone with a certificate does not fall within the protected ground and, therefore, exceptions on that protected ground-
Vera Baird: Will fall within the protected ground of sex,
Chairman: I think you have answered the question.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 25

Unsurprisingly Stephenson head of the EHRC is arguing to protect conversion therapies. & the BBC & others will accidentally fail to call her out on this disgusting opinion. Jail time and unlimited fines planned under conversion practices ban - BBC News share.google/j4bbiLSZYE1W...

Mary-Ann Stephenson, Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it's "crucial" the legislation has "clear definitions and boundaries" to protect legitimate medical treatment and therapy and to make sure religious freedoms are not "disproportionately restricted."

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 22

This 👇

Sophie
Links sky news article
"Gay and trans conversion therapy ban bil expected to be published
But the legislation being published in draft form next week could make it "tricky" to pass quickly"
& comments
"Expect it to allow for the continued conversion therapy of trans + people at the hands of the NHS"

Sarah replies,
Drink a shot of vour favourite liquor every time i t nentions "cautious," "watchful," "exploratory" and "questioning."

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 21

Google
Edgelord definition;

An edgelord is internet slang for someone who deliberately makes provocative, offensive, or exaggeratedly dark statements.
Typically found in online forums or social media, their primary goal is to shock others, stir up controversy, and appear cool or rebellious.
Key CharacteristicsPeople given the label "edgelord" often exhibit a few distinct traits:Nihilism & Misanthropy: They frequently express extreme cynicism, claiming not to care about anything or openly expressing hatred for humanity.
Shock Value: They use taboo language, dark humor, or shocking opinions specifically to trigger an emotional response or outrage from others.
Attention-Seeking: Despite trying to portray themselves as aloof or independent, their behavior is usually a bid to get noticed

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 20

@sarahowen.org.uk if Labour does nothing to undo this insane & dangerous Lady Ross judicial ruling Housing trans women inmates in women's prison is in all circumstances unlawful Then it will undeniable that Labour stands to the FAR right of both Conservatives & Reform share.google/KTSy330ZJdCJ...

Ann Widdecombe
Former Conservative & now Reform MP

“We have a duty to ensure [trans female prisoners’] safety too, and beyond all peradventure, they would not be safe in a male prison but liable to serious sexual assault, including rape,” she wrote in a column for GB News.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 14

🤣 I initially thought you meant this 👇

Image from PT Silent Hills demo
Famously cancelled by Konami.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 1

& American Cis men have already shown us precisely how that turns out 🤬 V-coding - Wikipedia share.google/yLURIoarf8qT... Trump sued over gutting rape safeguards for trans prisoners | Advocate.com share.google/UOLPkp4Hw3jq...

In the context of incarceration in the United States, V-coding is the common practice of subjecting trans women to sexual assault by placing the woman in the same prison cell as an aggressive male inmate in order to placate the male inmate. This practice has been known to have caused the daily rapes of multiple trans women, and the sexual assaults of 58.5% of them.V-coding is done to pacify the male inmate, with the goal of reducing their propensity for violence against other inmates, according to prison authorities and one inmate. The term has also been used to refer to the broader systemic sexual abuse of trans women in male prisons.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Jun 1

People & common sense are so often islands apart.

Warning Sign

DANGER
DO NOT HOLD THE WRONG END OF THE CHAINSAW

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 28

Example of how personally "silenced" Maya Forstater is for example 🙄

how many news articles quote
mava forstater, excluding social
media

There is no exact verified count of news articles quoting
Maya Forstater, because no public database tracks
"articles containing direct quotes" as a category.

But excluding

social media,
Reddit,
•
blogs,
orums,
•
and user reposts

a reasonable estimate is that she has been directly
quoted in several hundred mainstream news articles
probably somewhere around 300-800 unique articles
since 2018. That estimate is based on sustained
coverage across UK national newspapers, broadcasters,
legal reporting, and syndica , journalism. sky News +4
>

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 28

After almost 3 years, I've managed to get blocked by 133 people. All without being my old argumentative twitter self. Feels like quite the achievement 🥲

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 26

🤣 Sex Matters want the the new EHRC guidance withdrawn 🤣 But still incapable of recognising that transgender people (surely the 'trans' bit would have given it away) are the exception not the rule. & crying that they still can't legally harass transgender people for just for being transgender.

The EHRC guidance states: "Information about sex is
sensitive and should be treated as special category personal
data.

"Information about sex is likely to constitute special
category data for the purposes of the Data Protection Act
2018 (DPA) and UK General Data Protection Regulations
GDPR)."

Code of conduct is legally wrong
Sex Matters, the women's rights charitv. has written to Ms
Phillipson urging her to withdraw the guidance, claiming it
was "legally wrong' and risked undermining the rest of the
code.

Mava Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters. said in
the letter that she was "surprised and dismayed" to see the
guidance on special category data, claiming it went
significantly beyond the EHRC's mandate.

She wrote: "These statements are wrong in both fact and
law. For the vast majority of people, information about their
sex is not sensitive, and it is very rarely possible for anyone
to keep their sex private over sustained periods.

In a blog post published on its website, Sex Matters said staff
could be forced to second guess themselves before
questioning a man accessing a female-only space.

In turn, the charity said, this could lead to "unwanted
conduct" that was likely to meet the definition of
harassment under existing equality laws.

On Monday night, the Government opened the door to
rewriting the guidance within days of its publication, saying
it was "looking into" the concerns raised by campaigners.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 21

2nd Prompt "Does the new equality as a consequence of its wording promote exclusion & discrimination against transgender people both professionally and socially"?

Yes - it is reasonable to sav that critics believe the
wording of the new EHRC Code is likely to increase
exclusionary and discriminatory outcomes for some
transgender people both professionally and socially, ever
though the Code itself does not openly state that
discrimination is acceptable

That distinction matters legally

The Code still says trans people are protected from
discrimination because of gender reassignment

EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_serv.i..

However, the practical

concern is about the effects of the wording and how
nstitutions may apply it

Several aspects of the new wording are central to those
concerns.

That creates a distinction between
• people who identify as transgender and
• people who satisfy the statutory "gender reassignment" process test
Critics argue this may
• delegitimise some trans identities, • particularly affect non-binary and gender-fluid people,
• and encourage employers or organisations to question whether someone is "trans enough" tc qualify for protection
Professionally, this can create
• uncertainty around workplace inclusion • reluctance to support transition, • and increased scrutiny of trans employees
Socially, it can contribute to:
exclusion, invalidation, • or reduced recognitior
>

2. Emphasis on biological sex
The Code repeatedly states that "sex" means biologica sex for Equality Act purposes.
EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_servi.
It further states that a Gender Recognition Certificate does not change sex under the Act
T
EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_serv..
This is one of the biggest changes in practical effect.
Critics argue this wording may encourage:
• exclusion from single-sex spaces • stricter sex-segregated workplace policies • and institutional refusal to recognise acquired gender socially.
Potential effects include:
• workplace discomfort
social stigma,
• reduced participation in public life • and increased conflict r facilities or membership.

Overall

So the most accurate answer is:

The Code does not explicitly authorise
discrimination against transgender people.
But many legal experts, unions, employers, charities,
and trans advocacy organisations believe its
wording is likely to increase exclusionary outcomes
in practice - socially and professionally - especially
because it narrows recognition of trans identities
and prioritises biological sex in Equality Act

interpretation.

EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_servi..

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 21

Chatgpt prompt; "Please read through this pdf and explain how the definition of transgender and transition has changed from the original equality act 2010"

7. Practical consequence
Under the new Code:
A person may
• be protected for gender reassignment discrimination,
• but still legally count as their biological sex for sex based provisions.
That distinction is now central to the EHRC interpretation
EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_servi...
This especially affects:
single-sex services
associations,
prisons,
changing rooms
hospital
wards,
sport,
and sex-based exceptions in Chapter 13
EHRC_Code_of_Practice
servi...

6. Gender reassignment protectior
still exists

The Code does not remove protection

It repeatedly confirms that:

trans people remain protected against
discrimination,

no surgery is required

no GRC is required

protection begins at early stages of transition
•

EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_serv...

But the protection is now:

more tightly tied to "reassigning sex,"
less tied to identity language alone
and more separated from the protected
characteristic of sex

The new Code gives a more restrictive interpretation.
It says reassignment:
"does not have to be a medical process"
• but is "likely to at least involve more permanent
changes" such as:
changing pronouns
consistently dressing/ presenting as the
opposite sex.
EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_serv..
This is important because older interpretations often treated:
• occasional presentation changes • identity declarations • or looser forms of gender expression
as potentially sufficient.
The new wording introduces the idea of
permanence,
consistency,
‣ and direction toward oprosite-sex presentation.
>

A. "Transgender" is no longer treated as automatically protected
The code now explicitly says:
"This refers only to persons who fall within the Ac definition of gender reassignment. It does not inc persons who may identify as trans or transgender are outside of this definition."
EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_serv...
That is a significant shift
Previously:
"Transgender" was often used broadly and inclusively
Now:
The EHRC distinguishes between
• people with the legal protected characteristic of gender reassignment
people who merely identify as transgender
This narrows protection to ple engaged in what th code considers an actual reassianment process

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 17

Well this evening I'm here, tomorrow who know? findmypolitics.com?e=-85&so=-95...

Your coordinates: Economic L85, Social Lib95

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 13

Hmm wonder what & who these caveats are for? 🧐 Can anyone guess which experts will be contacted?

• The Government is clear that the ban must be balanced and targeted, so as
not to impinge on legitimate healthcare and the range of broader support that
those exploring their sexual orientation or gender identity might seek or
receive. It is also not intended to interfere with people's right to religious belief
and expression.

‣ There is cross-party and cross-society consensus to see these practices
banned. However, we need to ensure that the ban is effective in the
long-term. The draft Blill will therefore be put forward for pre-legislative
scrutiny, which will allow us to seek expert views from a range of
;takeholders, and inform the subsequent legislative approach.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 12

You couldn't make it up, Starmer is still pretending it's not over & he can somehow redeem himself & that he's still the saviour of the Labour Party. Deluded or Ego make your own minds up.

ITV News tracks 90 MPs prepared to oust PM

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 12

This ridiculous trope never ends does it 😞 people.com/hantavirus-c...

French woman was told by doctors hantavirus
symptoms were just anxiety

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· May 10

Well Steerpike from Spectator thinks so and the Spectator obviously would support a progressive left wing government 🙄

Spectator article 30 April 26

Steerpike

Is Streeting ready to be
PM?

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 25

1% regret rate extracted from the following; Reidentification With Birth-Registered Sex in a Western Australian Pediatric Gender Clinic Cohort | Pediatrics | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network share.google/bxBTteL3bBw2...

Extract from study;

Key Points
Question What proportion of young people seeking gender-affirming care subsequently reidentify with their birth-registered sex?

Findings In this cohort study of 548 individuals with closed referrals to a pediatric gender clinic, 29 (5.3%) reportedly reidentified with their birth-registered sex before or during assessment. Two of these individuals reidentified during medical treatment, which corresponds to 1.0% of all patients who initiated medical treatment.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 21

& the excuse; "Indecent Exposure Modernization Act," on March 26, and according to OhioHouse.gov, "strengthens Ohio law to protect children from harmful and obscene adult performances,”

Simpson scene;
Woman pleading
"Oh won't somebody please think of the children"?

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 21

I don't know if anyone has recently looked at their 'change of gender & name deed' poll certificate But as a legally binding document it seems pretty definitive, that transgender women live & be treated legally as women. Which begs the question how are courts dead naming & misgendering people 🤔

CHANGE OF GENDER AND NAME DEED ######

THIS CHANGE OF GENDER And name DEED made by myself the undersigned ‐-------
formerly called ‐------

WITNESSES AND IT IS HEREBY DECLAREd as follows:
I ABSOLUTELY give up and forswear the use of my former male gender and do take on and choose to use and live in the female gender from the date hereof.

I SHALL use the female gender and live as a female at all times hereafter for as long as I live, and not as a male.

AND I ABSOLUTELY give up and forswear the use of my former name of ‐--------- and assume, adopt and determine to take and use the name of ‐-------- in substitution for my former name of ---------

I SHALL at all times hereafter and for all purposes use and sign only the said name of -------- as my name, and not my former name of -------

I AUTHORISE AND REQUIRE all persons at all times to acknowledge, treat and behave towards me as a female, and to designate, describe and address me by my assumed name of --------

FURTHERMORE I absolutely give up and forswear the use of my former title of Mr and assume, adopt and choose to take and use from the date hereof the title of Miss in substitution for my former title of Mr.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 19

My irrelevant opinion for today. Strawberry jam & buttered toast is scandalously underrated.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 12

No love for Gunvalkyrie? 😢

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 11

Paul Knaggs is openly transphobic & disingenuous what a surprise 🙄 Which likely explains why he's a fan of Kate Harris of the infamous LGB Alliance. Although he seems to have a problem with queer people generally 🤔

Kate Harris promoting transphobia & sex matters as part role as the senior political correspondent.

Paul Knaggs mocking LGBTQ Labour members.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 5

Happy Eostre day

Image of Eostre the Goddess of the dawn, spring, fertility, and rebirth

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Apr 4

Estimates of deaths associated with the Department of
Government Efficiency (DOGE) funding cuts to USAID
orimarily targeting global health and food programs, range
from over 300,000 to more than 750,000 by early 2026
Reports indicate that a majority of these deaths, potentially
over 400.000, are children, driven by reduced support for
malaria, malnutrition, and HIV treatment. T The Times +3

Key Findings on "DOGE" Cuts Impact:

Total Mortality Estimates: Models tracker by
researchers estimated that by early 2026, over 757,000
people died as a result of the funding cuts, equating ta
roughly 88 deaths every hour. Other reports from late
2025 indicated at least 600,000 deaths.

◦ Impact on Children: The majority of the mortality impact
is on children. with estimates of over 200.000 to
400,000 child deaths resulting from discontinued food
programs and health services.

• Key Programs Affected: The cuts significantly reduced
funding for HIV/AIDS treatment (including PEPFAR)
malaria prevention, and maternal/child nutrition support.

• Long-Term Projections: Experts have warned that these
funding reductions could risk up to 14 million deaths over
five years.

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Mar 20

Malcolm X's words & sentiments are still all to relevant for transgender people on both sides of the Atlantic.

"If you stick a knife in my
back 6 inches and pull it out
6 inches, that's not progress.
If you pull it all the way out,
that's not progress. Progress
iS healing the wound that
the blow made. They
haven't pulled the knife out;
they won't even admit that
it's there."

--Malcolm X

Emma □ feet@scary-lil-emma· Mar 15

Gender critical/TERFS/anti-transgender activists have knowingly enabled and promoted & funded this. Attacks on Transgender people's rights have always been and are an attack on all people's rights, particularly women's rights & safe guards.