Killgore the Trout

@somenobody24

just some autistic guy trying to make it through the hellworld

2.284 Folgt1.468 Follower2.454 Posts

Bluesky

Ist das dein Profil?Übernimm es — dann gehört dir somenobody24.dirty.social.Profil übernehmen

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· 7d

Personal guess for the theory he's saying is wrong without saying is wrong is the whole "weird route amalgamate knight" thing.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 14

Could at least try it. Detailing how what they're saying is a bad faith argument cocked up by in-denial transmisogynists could do the trick.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 13

Since I, as far as I know, broke the news on this in the first place, I feel I have to break the news on this too. The r/Deltarune moderators have formally apologized for their previous decision on banning she/her pronouns for ralsei and have reevaluated their position completely.

"Going forward we will be making sure this is a safe space for all members, and that no matter what any form of bigotry is not tolerated, especially trans misogyny. Bigotry is something that affects the mod staff as well, as we are also populated by members of the LGBTQ+.

This is a formal apology for the previous post. We as moderators did not do enough research on this topic in order to understand how to moderate it. Any harm was not intentional. And we deeply regret how this has happened.

The rule going forward will be “No non constructive discussions about Ralsei’s gender/pronouns.” We want peaceful and open discussion, And going forward it is going to be treated like any other theory, in which no theory or interpretation of the text is incorrect until proven otherwise. And regardless everyone should be as polite as possible.

If you use She/Her when referring to Ralsei you will not be punished, and if you use He/Him or They/Them when referring to Ralsei you will also not be punished. Unless they are used in the context of upsetting another user, which is a form of harassment.

The tags are “discussions” and “theory”. They are not debates. And anyone using Ralsei being cis as a vehicle to spread trans misogyny will be punished.

Many people who support Trans Ralsei are trans themselves, and watching many of their post become massively negative arguments ridden with transphobia hurts them. And we can’t allow that. Just now a fellow transfem user was scared of the possibility of Trans Ralsei becoming canon, because of the backlash and uproar it would cause. Trans people should not be scared of a character being trans because of the hate their community will get for it. It is unacceptable and none of that hate will be tolerated here.

On the other side of the fence, many people who support cis but fem leaning Ralsei, are either feminine men themselves, or are against gender conformity. (With no doubt a few people who use it as an excuse to invalidate trans ide…

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 12

Stolen from another post on Reddit, r/Deltarune mods are thankfully reevaluating their Ralsei Pronouns policy decision. Dare I say it, bullying works.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 11

Not entirely sure if the second paragraph was always there, so I'm not entirely confident they're backing off completely, but the post and rule change being reverted seems like a sign that at the very least they're afraid of backlash.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 11

It appears they're already backpedaling. They've deleted the post and reverted the change to the rule they were modifying. Not gonna forget this, though. I will happily refer to Ralsei as exclusively she/her on this subreddit from now on.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jul 11

So instead of actually cracking down on transmisogyny and bickering by, say, banning people who correct Ralsei's pronouns in general, the r/Deltarune mods have opted for just banning she/her pronouns for Ralsei entirely.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 26

Spoilers if you haven’t reached the castle yet, but uh Yeah Ralsei ain’t “he/him”ing their way out of this one chat

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 25

Noelle is 16 apparently, (potentially) according to last year’s run of the thankyou arg, so that would set her at 2004 at earliest.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 20

Hasn't actually been confirmed or denied. Just based on their claim back in, what, February?

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 19

ahem

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 15

They also put out this statement regarding the video. I still think they’re giving Scawthon a little too much benefit of doubt.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Jun 9

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· May 25

I’ve seen two comments on here now so I assume they have somewhat of a following. Grabbed more screencaps of this behavior, seems it’s unfortunately the case.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· May 23

Also she totally did take the racism situation seriously, you just didn’t hear about it because the hate base you’re in didn’t acknowledge it because if they did they would have to admit they’re harassing a queer trans woman over nothing, other than her being queer and trans of course.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· May 23

“Self-claimed Nazi” lmao you mfs would see this tweet and claim she endorses cannibalism. Also love how clear it is that you’re STILL mad that Jax is a main character.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Apr 9

He was on fuckin Kiwifarms Idk about him defending a groomer specifically but he isn’t a good person either way.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 25

Minos Prime from Ultrakill with a Speech Bubble above his head, colored to resemble the UI of Bluesky’s Dark Mode

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 22

Idkkk, maybe he comes back, maybe someone reconstructs-

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 7

#savespeech #kosa Found this odd, both Govtrack and the Congress website seem to imply that KIDS has also been referred to the Judiciary Committee instead of just E&C? So...it might not even be completely out of Committee yet? I'm not sure though.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 5

This bill text from the senate version at least confirms COPPA 2.0 won’t be used for AV.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 5

#savespeech #kosa On the results of the markup today, I’m just straight up going to post this comment from r/politicaloptimism on it

“Right, I think it's time to take a step back for a minute.
The KIDS Act is not the worst-case scenario. We hate it for obvious reasons, but given the absolute flood of state age verification laws of late, a federal AV law for adult websites would change very, very little in this country. The regulations on design features for online platforms don't carry any mandates like what ChatControl used to have, and the text of them specifically preempts any interpretation that forces age verification on social media.
Most of what it requires, other than the poisonous idea of age verification, is already done by the great majority of the websites we use. A mandate for "establishing reasonable policies addressing harms to minors" is nothing like a duty of care, especially when the harms listed are HIGHLY illegal things which these websites already moderate. The fact that it mandates functioning user report systems is something I could fully get behind in a bill that was less overly broad.
And no, it has not passed the House. It's not even guaranteed a floor vote. It was reported out of committee.
The amount of time between this stage and a floor vote, if one ever comes, is usually very substantial, meaning we have plenty of time to work. Even worse for it than that, it only made it out of committee along party lines, meaning that it's going to face an almost impossible path in the Senate from the moment it gets there, if it ever even does, and I do mean "if". Thune's reluctance, Cruz's spite, Blumenthal and Blackburn's insistence on something worse, the progressive wing's hostility toward age verification, and Wyden's stubborn use of procedural hurdles almost guarantee a death by a thousand cuts.
Do. Not. Panic. Do not get demoralized, do not let yourselves be defeated in advance, do not fall for doomer misinformation on other subs and YouTube, and do not fucking give up.”

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 5

I get that this is probably a joke, but this is what the bill itself outlines. Correct me if I’m wrong but wouldn’t this mean there would only need to be four groups?

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 5

Also here’s what I think that guy was referring too? Moreso seems to be the idea that requiring ID as the only method is “outdated” and that there’s other, PII-free methods.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 2

“Complex age verification system.” Meanwhile, the bill text itself: hey uhhh just have the user put in their date of birth or age.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Mar 1

Bill’s already passed. No idea why op’s trying to stir the pot about this. EFF and FSC, actual privacy rights orgs that have been in this shit for decades and oppose most AV legislation, see it as an acceptable compromise.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Feb 24

They aren’t in session the second week of March, and it evidently hasn’t been scheduled exactly yet. There is a chance Trump’s constant chicanery starts a fire that will fuck up their whole scheduling.

Killgore the Trout@somenobody24· Feb 22

Yeahh I checked the bill text. It outright states the “Age-bracket data” can’t be Personally Identifying (so no Face or ID or Drivers License) and would instead be something like your DoB or your age.