Justin Fox
@byjustinfox
Columnist @opinion.bloomberg.com. Opinions mine, charts property of Bloomberg LP (although you are of course welcome to share them).
To be clear this is not some groundbreaking discovery I have made here. @jdlahart.bsky.social wrote about it in May: www.wsj.com/economy/jobs...
... so it seems like unemployment rates for grads and non grads have been coming closer together mainly because of non-grads leaving the labor force (meaning they neither have a job nor are looking for one) and thus not being counted as unemployed. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
The gap between the unemployment rates for young college grads and non-grads has been shrinking, leading to much talk about the declining value of a college degree. But labor force participation has been rising for college grads and falling for non-grads ... www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Why gas prices were down in the July CPI, which is supposed to reflect average prices over the course of the month, even though they rose in July. (Data from the US Energy Information Administration)
Another fun chart. Gift link to column with lots more: www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
New York has not experienced a boom in journalism employment over the past quarter century. The number of news analysts, reporters and journalists there appears to be up just slightly, and the 2000 figure may be an undercount. But most other big US cities have seen their numbers collapse.
Nearly 20% of US "news analysts, reporters and journalists" are in the New York and DC metro areas, up from a little over 10% a quarter century ago. Gift link: www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
The kind of book review that catches my attention (from a great new @kedseconomist.com column on Social Security) www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Where it all began (from the New York Post of Oct. 26, 1809), via NYS Historic Newspapers www.nyshistoricnewspapers.org?a=is&oid=nep...
The employment numbers for 65 and older are up because they revised the population numbers upwards (the 16-24 decline may be real though)
As intended, President Trump's policies are incentivizing Americans to stay home and read books www.bls.gov/opub/ted/202...
And no this isn't just about the NYPD classifying more assaults as felonies, Misdemeanor assaults and harassment are up too. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Serious assaults are on the decline in most of the US, but not in NYC (new column with gift link) www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
US gasoline consumption was falling before the Hormuz shutdown (from a new column on what comes after the gas tax) www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Throw in real estate, and the FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) share of GDP did (barely) hit an all-time record in 2025. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
The financial sector's share of US GDP was (1) near an all-time record in 2025 but (2) hasn't risen much since the early 2000s after big gains in the 1980s and 1990s. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
So while it's probably not true that the top 10% account for 45.8% of consumer spending it's also probably not true that they account for only 22.9% (which is what the BLS survey says). And the BLS finding that the top 20%'s share of spending has been flat for decades seems pretty suspect.
Higher-income Americans seem to be especially wary of responding to the BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey. Its estimates of the share of *income* going to the top 20% are much lower and have risen much less through the decades than those from other sources. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
It's a backwards way of calculating consumer spending, and one shouldn't expect it to be super accurate. But the main direct measure we have of consumer spending by income, the @usbls.bsky.social Consumer Expenditure Survey, has lots of issues of its own. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
I took a closer look at that controversial Moody's Analytics statistic attributing nearly 50% of consumer spending to the top 10% of the income distribution (after some revisions last year, the percentage is currently 45.8%). Gift link: www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Morrill, who later became Treasury Secretary, was replying to a speech by Garrett Davis of Kentucky, who argued that US citizenship was only for white people. Here's what Morrill had to say about that in particular. archive.org/details/cong...
Some birthright citizenship commentary from 1866 (by US Senator Lot Morrill of Maine during the Senate debates over the 14th Amendment) archive.org/details/cong...
Break it down by age and things get really interesting www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
Institutionalization in the US, the long view (that last big jump in 1980s and 1990s was the incarceration boom, but earlier increases were more about psychiatric institutions, homes for the developmentally disabled, orphanages, etc.). Gift link: www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
One of my favorite exchanges from the 1866 birthright citizenship debates (between US Senators Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, the Judiciary Committee chairman and primary author of the 13th Amendment, and Edgar Cowan of Pennsylvania) www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
The streetcar boomlet in historical perspective (gift link) www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...