Thoth
@thoth
Mid-20s, CS grad, unemployed. The world is a trashfire. 🏳️🌈 I've had this username for ages and I still don't know much of anything.
I think this is the part that made my brain explode a little. Just think a bit harder, Andrew! If eliminating bugs costs engineering resources, and there are style guidelines or language features that prevent the bugs from being introduced, THOSE THINGS FREE UP ENGINEERING RESOURCES.
I'd like meson more if they didn't persist in making their rust-related docs just the bitchiest, whiniest shit because they're still butthurt about cargo existing. They can't even introduce their module docs without sneering!
Holy shit just stop digging. (this is not my screenshot btw, I cribbed it from @oracularhades.com's post because fuck if I'm going to Threads to get one myself)
from @erlend.sh's blog. and yup. continuing in my recent vein of bashing OIDC this is all very true and incredibly depressing given OIDC's origins.
Please show me where the CJEU actually made that distinction. I also notice that you are a mastodon user. Are you aware that, on Mastodon AND Bluesky, posting time IS provided by the user?
The W3C's Big RDF/Semantic Web Push in the late 90s and early 2000s was a grievous tactical error that directly contributed to the corporate capture and ossification of the web into siloed walled gardens in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
if it's so "unique" then why did they push the design in directions that make it look even more like other cars?
"my antisocial behavior proves my book is right and I refuse to change!" This... reminds me of something...
Have you never seen the "firebombing a wal-mart" tweet? If you don't know that "toppling the government" is a term of art in the parlimentary system (again, my bad), it SOUNDS like the post I was responding to was advocating violent overthrow of the government. Again, my mistake.
it's always weird to see breathless marketing copy describing a feature so utterly mundane that any system that didn't have it would be seen as a total non-starter for actual use today.
In the words of Groucho Marx: "well, who are you gonna believe? Me, or your own eyes?"
Like, seriously. What are we even doing. "If you write enough with chatgpt your brain will degrade and it will be like you're permanently drunk" is an INSANE thing to say, and that study's findings cannot justify it for just. So many different reasons.
In case you're wondering if programmers are fundamentally different than they were in 1975: They are not.
I for one am glad we do not live in a world where instead of forking, creating a new commit on an old version of the software rebases all subsequent changes instead.
"safety protocols are for stranger interactions" is uh. Yeah I'm with 4.7 on this one, that seems incredibly manipulative.
I know it can happen to anyone and it's not the end of the world or anything but also holy shit having a typo in the middle of the message where you tell users there's an outage is not a good look!