Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀

@nattygo

I'm just Nat! No, I'm the OTHER trans Natalie from Maryland.

4.582 Folgt2.194 Follower7.740 Posts

YouTube Bluesky

trans

Ist das dein Profil?Übernimm es — dann gehört dir nattygo.dirty.social.Profil übernehmen

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 11

POV a scone at this tea party that I'm about to devour

Natalie in a pink dress at a lovely tea party

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 7

AIPAC mentioned!

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 7

My nail technician was confused that I wanted to leave my index and middle finger much shorter than the others I guess she didn't recognize my wristband

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 5

Hot girl (literally)

Natalie laid out on the bed looking very hot

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 5

It's not great!

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 4

Extremely correct

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 4

Mother Nature hates Trump as much as we do

Severe thunderstorm watch issued for Fourth of July

by First Alert Meteorologist Steve Rudin

Sat, July 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Updated Sat, July 4, 2026 at 2:40 PM

WEATHER ALERT

First Alert Weather continues to forecast scattered strong to severe thunderstorms for the 4th of July.

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

Give this post a like if you think this fat chick should have the big tits of her dreams

A white woman wearing a pink headband and a pink and yellow dress with pink sunglasses at the bridge of her nose looking cheeky

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

"How dare you fly such a blood-stained flag" is literally just this

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

You can just imagine the DOJ lawyer struggling to keep a straight face while writing this

Case 4:26-cv-00748-0

Document 34

Filed 07/02/26

Page 4 of 26

PageID 644

3

extent WPATH-TX has any legal gripe with this enforcement action, it is free to raise it before this forum. And should it disagree with this Court's resolution of those gripes, the proper course is an appeal to the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court. What it cannot do is what it has tried to do here: ask a district judge across the country to superintend this Court's proceedings.

WPATH-TX has made no secret about why it is attempting this gambit and it is not because it thinks its far-fetched (and in fact, oft-rejected) legal theories have any merit. It is because it does not trust the Northern District of Texas to handle this matter fairly. In its D.D.C. filing, WPATH-TX made the extraordinary claim that this District is an outlier on these issues and mischaracterized it as essentially a rubber-stamp for the government, unbounded by law. This Court should not countenance an effort premised on that offensive and baseless theory. There is no doubt that district judges in the Northern District of Texas will apply the law as fairly and impartially as district judges anywhere else.

Accordingly, this Court should protect its own jurisdiction and enjoin WPATH-TX's attempt to "circumvent the authority of this Court and the Fifth Circuit" through collateral proceedings. In re Admin. Subpoena 25-1431-032, No. 4:26-mc-0006 (N.D. Tex. May 18, 2026), ECF No. 26 at 6. This Court should grant the Federal Trade Commission, Texas, and Iowa's ("Movants") Motion as swiftly as practicable. Given this highly irregular and improper course of action by WPATH-TX, this Court should take steps to protect its jurisdiction by enjoining the Defendants in this case from seeking relief regarding this proceeding in any court other than this Court, the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court. Such injunctions are appropriate when a party seeks

2 As explained herein, the District Court in the District of Columbia has set …

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

Slightly better screenshot

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

LOL shots fired in the direction of Texas by Judge Pitts here

Packard is not the only hospital outside Texas that DOJ has targeted from that state. In April, DOJ sought (and received) an order from the Northern District of Texas compelling Rhode Island Hospital to disclose the patient records of transgender minors in response to an administrative subpoena.31 And on the same day DOJ issued the grand jury subpoena at issue in this case, it issued a nearly identical subpoena to NYU Langone Hospitals in New York.32 Nothing on the face of the grand jury subpoena served on Packard suggests any nexus to Texas—for example, the requested records are not limited to care provided to patients from Texas. But as the Texas judge presiding over certain matters relating to DOJ’s subpoenas has explained, DOJ is “a frequent forum shopper.”33 In the related matters involving subpoenas issued to Rhode Island Hospital and NYU Langone, courts have found that DOJ is engaged “in an obvious effort to shield its recent investigative tactics—previously rejected by every other court to review them—from [those courts’] review, in favor of a distant forum that DOJ deems friendly to its political positions.” In re Admin. Subpoena 25-1431-032 to Rhode Island Hosp., 2026 WL 1392565, at *1; see also Transcript of Teleconference Decision at 8, Coe v. Blanche, No. 26-cv-4641 (S.D.N.Y. June 24, 2026), Dkt. No 89 at 11 (“[T]his Court will not blind itself to [the] reality … of DOJ’s efforts … to recast discredited civil administrative subpoenas as grand jury subpoenas from a hand-picked faraway jurisdiction in order to minimize judicial review of constitutional infirmities.”). Hoping to challenge the disclosure of their medical records in the district where both they and the records reside, plaintiffs filed suit in this Court on May 27, 2026. Their original complaint asserted claims only against Packard, arguing that Packard was a government actor whose disclosure of patient records would violate plaintiffs’ rights under the Fourth and Fifth 31 See In re Admin. Su…

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 3

This is very not good

Air Quality Forecast for DC predicting code purple (very unhealthy) air quality for the 4th and 5th

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

This is the email that I just received from the Trump regime's Social Security Administration

This weekend, America celebrates its 250th birthday. For over 90 of those years, Social Security has provided financial freedom for America's seniors. President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Administration are not only protecting Social Security, but we are providing meaningful and immediate relief to older Americans who have spent decades contributing to our nation's economy.

Just last year, on July 4, 2025, President Trump signed into law the Working Families Tax Cuts Act. This historic legislation included a tax cut that allows Americans 65 and older to keep more of their hard-earned Social Security benefits. Thanks to President Trump, over 35 million American seniors received an average of $7,500 in relief this tax season.

If you did not take advantage of the President's signature tax cut for seniors, I encourage you to review eligibility requirements through the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) website for next year's tax filing season.

Under the leadership of President Trump, we are protecting and strengthening Social Security while providing world-class customer service:

In SSA field offices, we've reduced wait times by 30 percent;

On the phone, we've answered calls 75 percent faster,

We're meeting the needs of seniors in the digital age with 24/7 access to online my Social Security accounts;

We've increased the number of personal my Social Security accounts to over 100 million users and have processed over 100 million more transactions this year;

For disability claimants, we have reduced processing times by 25 percent, and

Our efforts to prioritize efficiency, streamline our processes, and decrease wait times are saving Americans time while delivering the highest quality service.

Put simply, America's seniors are winning! I'm honored to be in your service.

Happy 250th birthday, America!

Frank J. Bisignano

Commissioner

Social Security Administration

2

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

Gaines' teammates have had no issues calling her on her bullshit

“She’s developing her stance according to who’s supporting her,” says Gaines’ former teammate. “With her sponsorships and with the big people commenting saying ‘you’re doing great things,’ I think it was inevitable that it would have led to that.”

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

A reminder that Gaines was actually quite gracious about her trans opponent Lia Thomas until she realized how much attention she could get - and money should could make - from the professional transphobia circuit www.cnn.com/2025/07/04/u...

At first, Gaines insisted she didn’t blame Thomas personally for competing – and winning – in a sport that aligned with her gender identity.

“I am in full support of her and full support of her transition and her swimming career and everything like that,” she told the conservative outlet, The Daily Wire, in 2022, “because there’s no doubt that she works hard too, but she’s just abiding by the rules that the NCAA put in place, and that’s the issue.”

But as her platform and prominence grew over the years, Gaines’ views appear to have shifted and she began espousing harsher, anti-trans rhetoric both on her podcast, “Gaines for Girls,” and in appearances with prominent Republican lawmakers – and her work has had a wide-ranging impact.

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

All she has is fifth place (tied) and awkwardly expressed reactionary talking points

“I am a conservative who believes in limited government, that’s not just like a talking point,” she said. “I don’t want the government stepping in and infringing on my life, therefore, I don’t want it stepping in and infringing on other people's lives. But I think where we’ve seen the harm of the trans movement is our rights as women have been infringed upon.”

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

She really is just as dumb as a bag of teeth, isn't she?

Gaines’ most flummoxing rhetoric came toward the end of her interview. When Levin asked what she thought about the rights of trans people, Gaines said, “So long as my taxpayer dollars aren't being used and it’s between consenting adults, I really don'’ care.” What does being trans have to do with consenting adults? Gaines seems to, as per usual on the right, confuse gender with sexuality and painting trans identity as some kind of sexual fetish, rather than, well, an identity.

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

You know, Riley, lesbians who don't want to date trans women can just say they don't want to date trans women! We don't want to date anyone who doesn't want to date us! www.them.us/riley-gaines...

“I've talked to so many lesbians specifically who are pretty peeved that they find men who claim to be women on their dating apps,” Gaines said.

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 2

Of all the things that never happened, this never happened the most

이

politicshome.com/new

+

23

:

PoliticsHome

Tooking at that:

"I mean, it does create an issue, right?" Stephenson acknowledges. "However," she adds, "in most circumstances where we operate single-sex services, we don't use legal documentation." She gives the real-life example of having been on a train station platform late at night when a man entered the women's toilets.

"The woman washing her hands next to me at the scene said, 'Oh you're in the wrong room,' and he left. Then, about five minutes later, we were on the other platform, she came up to me and said, 'Is that the man we saw in the toilets?' I looked, and it was: we saw him hanging around outside, then going back into the women's toilet, at which point we went and told the guard.

Plain Simple Natalie 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🦀@nattygo· Jul 1

The great @lawdorknews.bsky.social pulled this from Kavanaugh's majority opinion today in WV v BJP Our boy Brett is just plain wrong here Gorsuch in Bostock pointed out that discriminating based on trans status necessarily implies sex discrimination and *the reverse is also true*