Trans+ Solidarity Alliance

@transsolidarity

Fighting for trans+ rights, together.

188 Folgt3.988 Follower599 Posts

Bluesky

trans

Ist das dein Profil?Übernimm es — dann gehört dir transsolidarity.dirty.social.Profil übernehmen

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· 27d

What does the EHRC code do, and not do? www.transsolidarityalliance.com/post/ehrc-co...

It is important to note that the Code of Practice applies to services, public functions, and associations and not - for example - the employment setting. It is also important to be clear that this is guidance for duty bearers (usually organisations), not criminal law that applies to individual members of the public.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Jul 7

EDM 240, against the EHRC’s harmful guidance, has reached 164 signatures including dozens of Labour MPs. Hear from some of them here: www.itv.com/news/2026-07...

Itv news
Your Area V
Categories V
Trans people at risk of
'enforced segregation' under new guidelines, says MP
POLITICS | LGBT+ | EQUALITY | GENDER
Monday 6 July 2026 at 7:37pm

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Jun 15

🆕 Alongside colleagues, we have written to the Prime Minister setting out the damage he is doing to our community. We have made clear that this is a political choice. The UK must pick another path, and the responsibility here lies with government. Read more: transactual.org.uk/blog/2026/06...

Dear Prime Minister,
We have all written to this government numerous times in the past year to warn you about the devastating impact of your approach to LGBTQ+ policy on the ability of trans people to participate in public life with dignity. This Government failed to act at any point to secure and defend trans people's fundamental rights and protections, and the current situation has become completely untenable for a rights-respecting nation.
The Supreme Court's job is to interpret statute, it is for our political representatives to set out a coherent vision for what the law should be and to make the law better. Even before the For Women Scotland judgment, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has acted in a way that has shredded our community's trust in regulators and institutions. This is not good enough.
The Code of Practice now before Parliament is set to crystallise an interpretation of the law that is fundamentally in conflict with the UK's human rights obligations. Many MPs have already spoken out about the unjust and unworkable situation the code would create, and more than a hundred have already used the limited available scrutiny process to oppose it.
We urge you to listen to these concerns. The Code does not provide clarity; it exacerbates confusion, conflict, and risk. We have consistently argued that a Code of Practice must pass three tests to be workable: it must protect trans people's ability to participate fully in society, support organisations that wish to remain inclusive, and comply with the UK's domestic and international human rights obligations. This Code fails on all counts.
Prime Minister, the everyday harms this causes will be wide-ranging. This will be viewed as Labour's legacy on LGBTQ+ rights for a generation.

You still have the opportunity to intervene - scrap this harmful guidance and change the law to fix the mess we find ourselves in.

The government's own Equality Impact assessment outlines these consequences starkly, warning of discrimination, physical danger, and limiting trans people's access to vital services. Beyond just our trans communities, the assessment warns of the dangers of appearance-based gender policing on the safety of the public at large.
This Code of Practice could absolutely have been better within the current legal framework, and its current raft is dangerous and unacceptable. This is, however, also a symptom of the broader legislative probler acing our community and requiring action from our governmen
Last year's Supreme Court ruling turned Parliament's intentions for UK equality law on its head. It interpreted the Equality Act in a way that is clearly in direct opposition to decades of deliberate policymaking and well-documented intent. It has turned decades-old settled policy on how trans people should be treated into a mess of contradictory, harmful and incoherent rules.
The current Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy MP, said this in response to a proposed amendment to prevent trans people accessing services in line with our gender identities when debating the Gender Recognition Act before it was passed more than twenty years ago:
“the Government entirely reject the implication of the new clause that transsexuals might set out to cause offence to others. That is not the Government's experience, and we therefore reject the new clause. The Government also believe that separate facilities for minority groups are objectionable, and we urge the House to reject the proposal."
Yet now your Government is set to approve a Code that not only condones that approach but encourages it as the norm across Britain. The Supreme Court said that their ruling would not be disadvantageous to or remove protection from trans people with or without a GRC", but the government's own impact assessment now makes clear that widespread harm is happening.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Jun 10

Keep the pressure up: equalrecognition.eaction.org.uk/rejectthecode

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Jun 9

And thank you to all MPs who have spoken to us about the Code of Practice in the last week. Every signature, every spoken contribution in the chamber, every letter to ministers, every act of resistance matters to keep pressure up to fix this mess.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Jun 1

Worth noting, if your MP hasn't signed it already - that doesn't mean they won't. These are just very early signatories. It's too early to judge who will and will not choose to sign, but not too early to urge them to do so: equalrecognition.eaction.org.uk/rejectthecode

reject the code
our communities deserve better

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 27

This is a political choice. By @fruitypy.bsky.social today. Please share widely for those who don’t understand the scale of the problem ❤️ www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Trans people’s legal protections, hard-won and vital, clearly no longer work. We elect our politicians to be legislators, and they must fix the law itself. Not doing so is a political choice, and they cannot hide behind the courts in making it. As we go headfirst into becoming an outlier in the rights-respecting world, the picture is bleak – but it’s not too late to change it.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 24

Yeesssss! There will be a briefing ahead of time + when we did one last year we had these and plan to do similar + maybe a takeaway for the MP as last year the MPs kept nicking them for their use so people were left without souvenirs 😢

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 22

This is not equality. www.theguardian.com/world/2026/m...

Like many transgender individuals the Guardian has interviewed in recent years, Alice is making plans to move out of the UK. “It’s been made abundantly clear that I’m not welcome. I love my job and my family have a happy life here, but I will not be a second-class citizen in my own country.”

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 18

just for anyone who wants push alerts with the detail when it's available, this is the icon:

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 18

This CoP is likely submitted as an 'unnumbered act paper', and is laid under the terms of Section 14 of the Equality Act 2006. Act papers like this can only be formally laid while Parliament sits. The Act requires it to be subject to the same 40 day period of 'scrutiny' (people get to see it) as...

Appendix B
Comprehensive summary table of what can and cannot be presented or laid during recesses.
Type of paper or Instrument Sitting day Adjournment
recess
Prorogation Dissolution “Swearing in” day at
start of Parliament
Statutory Instruments (SIs)
Draft SI Yes No No No Yes
SI subject to affirmative resolution before coming into
force
Yes No No No Yes
“Made” SI subject to affirmative resolution after coming
into force
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Any other “Made” SI (including negative resolution
instruments)
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Special Procedure Order (for compulsory purchase of
certain categories of land)
Yes No No No No
Legislative reform order Yes No No No No
Instruments made under Act other than Statutory
Instruments Act 1946 – mostly Oxford or Cambridge
Statutes or Naval and Marine Pay and Pensions – can
come in non standard formats
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Papers
Command Paper, that is a paper laid by command of Her
Majesty, white or green papers, departmental annual
reports and treaties
Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Act Paper printed by order of the House (and has a
“HC” number)
Yes No No No No
Any other Act Paper Yes Received but treated as laid on the first
sitting day after the recess; the receipt
sheet should be stamped and
endorsed: “To be recorded as laid on
(first sitting date after the recess)”
No As for recess and
prorogation; will be
minuted as having been
laid on the first day of the
session
Returns
Return Yes No No No No
Other documents
Church of England Measures Yes Yes Yes No Yes

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 18

📑 What does that mean in detail? It’s clear that the FWS judgment has significantly damaged trans people’s rights, despite claims to the contrary. There are, however, differing interpretations and this will make a significant difference in everyday life. We will be watching closely.

Protect trans people's access to gendered spaces:
Preserves the norm of trans inclusion that has worked for decades.
Ensures trans people are never forced into unsafe facilities for their gender assigned at birth.
Does not paint trans people's inclusion as inherently dangerous or risky.
Does not promote the segregation of trans people into 'third spaces'.

Defend inclusive organisations:
Provides clear and workable solutions to remain inclusive.
Gives inclusive services confidence to defend themselves from anti-trans lawfare.
Does not tell associations and groups to tear trans members away from their friends.
Defends trans-inclusive freedom of association for all.

Honour the UK's human rights commitments:
Protects trans people from being outed as we go about our daily lives.
Does not encourage regressive gender policing that harms us all.
Avoids painting trans people's rights as somehow inherently in conflict with others in a 'zero sum game'
Protects trans people's access to vital services and community activities without suffering discrimination.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 18

➡️ The Minister for Women and Equalities has again said she plans to lay new EHRC guidance this week, in a media appearance. A reminder of how organisations like us, @transactualuk.bsky.social and @scottishtrans.bsky.social will be judging any new Code of Practice:

We are weeks away from new EHRC
guidance, what do we need from it?
1. To protect trans people's access to gendered spaces.
2. To defend inclusive organisations.
3. To honour the UK's human rights commitments.

We cannot let exclusion become the status quo.
If the law can no longer deliver these basic protections, it is
fundamentally broken.
We are holding this government to account, and we will keep going.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 14

It is also cited as a big reason for defecting from Labour to the SNP in the Scottish elections by 9% of respondents 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 and by 8% of all Labour > Left defectors in Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿. Across 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lab > left defectors, collapsing both those going Green & Lib Dem - it's cited as a top reason by 12% of these voters.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· May 14

📊 NEW: Among 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Green voters overall and Labour > Green defectors, more people cite support for trans and other minority rights as a major reason than Palestine, housing or the cost of living. Trans rights issues don't decide elections, but they remain a high saliency issue for progressive voters.

Bar chart

Stated reasons for voting Green [Green 2026 voters only]
"You said you plan to vote Green at the local elections. Below are some reasons people have given us for voting Green. Please pick up to three
reasons closest to your own."
All Green LE2026 Lab 24→ Green 2026
Their policies and values are closest to my own 40% 37%
Their commitment to tackling climate change
and protecting the environment 32% 22%
They want to tax the rich and redistribute wealth 32% 33%
They are the only genuinely left-wing/
progressive party on offer 28% 21%
They would take water, rail and other utilities
back into public ownership 26% 30%
To send a message against Reform UK and the
rise of the far right 24% 26%
Local Green councillors or candidates do good
work for the area 18% 18%
Their support for trans rights and other minorities 15% 15%
Zack Polanski is the best leader on offer 14% 14%
Their stance on Gaza and Palestine 12% 12%
They care about the cost of living 11% 13%
They are the best of a bad bunch 11% 14%
To send a message to Labour / Keir Starmer that
they've taken left-leaning voters for granted 10% 17%
They care about housing and rent 4% 3%
Other
Don't know

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 24

Anti-rights movements won't stop with trans people. The Alliance Defending Freedom campaign against abortion rights, gay marriage, and anti-discrimination laws. Now they are openly backing a case against Parkrun for including trans participants. www.independent.co.uk/sport/great-...

They helped overturn roe v wade, now they're suing parkrun.

An evangelical anti-abortion group has broken cover in the UK to back 'gender critical' lawfare.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 23

Proud to have added our name to this vital manifesto by @tgeuorg.bsky.social and others tgeu.org/transfeminism/

In this together for trans feminist solidarity

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 20

🚨 Trans kids need our help. We only have until Wednesday to make our voices heard on proposed changes to ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ statutory guidance. We are really worried about what the government has proposed. Will you take action? www.theproudtrust.org/about-us/blo...

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 19

One year ago today. Our small, skilled, volunteer team hasn’t stopped since the FWS judgment, and we need your help. Will you support our work? www.zeffy.com/en-GB/donati... Most of what we do is behind the scenes, but here’s how we have used your funding so far:

Trans and pride flags at protest in London

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 16

🚨 Now is not the time to give up and retreat. Please write to your MP in our joint campaign with TransActual to protect trans workers actionnetwork.org/letters/fix-... We need to build a fighting fund for what comes next. Will you help us fight for a better future? www.zeffy.com/en-GB/donati...

Now is not the time to give up.
We’re all tired, but we need your help to hold this government to account and fight for a better future.
Your help makes a real difference.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 16

🏛️ We all know what new guidance needs to do for it to improve this mess. This is our 3 point test for a new Code of Practice, if these basic needs can't be fulfilled by our Equality Act - it will no longer be worth of the name. We will keep pushing until we have equality. But we need your help ➡️

Defend trans people’s right to access spaces in line with their lived gender.
Bring the UK back into line with its human rights obligations.
The minimum we need from a new EHRC Code of Practice:
Protect inclusive spaces and freedom of association from anti-trans lawfare.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 16

⚖️ One year ago, the Supreme Court promised us our rights were still protected. 🟰 Since then - our lives have become less free, less safe and less equal. Where is the dignity and respect in this? 📝 It's going to take more than minor tweaks to make a difference here. What happens now? ➡️

A year of hurt and harm.
We know what happened next.
They promised us this wouldn’t happen.
Today is one year since the Supreme Court said their decision wouldn’t cause any disadvantage to trans people.

Our lives have become less free, less safe and less equal.
Trans people have been kicked out of bathrooms, forced out of workplaces, and outed against their will.
Both cis and trans people have experienced dangerous gender policing, putting their safety at risk.
Trans women and girls have been torn away from their friends, in groups that wanted to remain inclusive.
Where is the dignity?
Where is the respect?

For trans people to be meaningfully protected by equality laws, they must protect our ability to live our lives as ourselves as Parliament intended. Any changes to guidance from this government will need to be more than trivial tweaks to make a difference to the mess this ruling has created.
We need action from Labour to protect trans people, defend inclusive organisations and respect human rights - or we will see yet more years of legal protections being undermined and trans people harmed."
Our team speaking to media on the anniversary

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Apr 5

Reminder: trans kids need our help. 📚 The government’s proposed changes to ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ would fail trans pupils. 🏫 The draft safeguarding guidance would turn teachers into gender cops. ⏰ Act now, there’s not long left. www.theproudtrust.org/about-us/blo...

Trans pupils are being failed.

The Government’s draft ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ guidance is a threat to the safety and wellbeing of trans+ kids at school and college.

Is this dignity?

Trans+ students will be banned from toilets and changing rooms that reflect their gender.

Schools and colleges will be allowed to refuse a child or young person’s request to socially transition.

Is this respect?

Trans and non-binary students will be encouraged to not come out.

The proposals label all trans and non-binary children as ‘gender questioning’.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Mar 31

It should always be a personal choice. However, trans people are losing autonomy over their visibility. Forcibly outed in the workplace. Forbidden from coming out in our schools. Help us fight back. #TDoV

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Mar 26

We have partnered with @transactualuk.bsky.social to fix these decades old regulations. They are no longer fit for purpose, are creating huge harm to trans+ workers and posing unworkable operational challenges for employers. We need your help. Act now: actionnetwork.org/letters/fix-...

We must fight this.
These rules are outdated and no longer fit for purpose. Trans+ people have the same rights as any other workers.
Tell your MP what’s going on, and share your story, at the link in our bio.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Mar 26

We are facing a workers' rights crisis for our community, and we need your help. Outdated workplace regulations, last updated in the early 90s, are now being interpreted as requiring the exclusion and outing of trans+ people in the workplace. actionnetwork.org/letters/fix-...

This is a workers' rights crisis.
Outdated workplace regulations are becoming tools of exclusion.
Trans+ people are being sent home from their jobs, unsure when, or how, they can return.

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Mar 24

You can read our response to this awful news here: www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home...

Campaign group Trans+ Solidarity Alliance described the news as “heartbreaking” for children.

They said: “Inclusive organisations being bullied into excluding people against their will is a profound failure of this Government to live up to its promises to the trans community.

“This news will be heartbreaking for the children and volunteer leaders that hold Girlguiding together, to fix a problem that doesn’t exist without anti-trans lawfare.”

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Feb 16

We have been featured on the list before for our community work with Trans Secret Santa UK, and it’s lovely to be back for 2026 with a focus on our political advocacy work 💪 www.bigissue.com/news/activis...

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Feb 13

Our take on the judgment: incoherent, unworkable and needs to be fixed or we face a workers rights crisis. We will be campaigning hard to fix this mess, watch this space.

“The legal situation for trans people, employers and service providers is now completely incoherent. What bathroom a trans person can use in a pub may now depend whether they are there as an employee or for a drink. We are pleased the court has confirmed that the Equality Act does not function as a bathroom ban, but outdated workplace regulations have failed to keep up with modern times and last year’s Supreme Court judgment has made them entirely unworkable.

“This risks outing trans people at work, who may have been using gendered facilities without issue for years - and it is unclear how trans people without access to gender neutral facilities will be able to do their jobs. This is a worker's rights crisis for the trans community, and one which will cause issues for employers across the country.

“The High Court has clarified that trans people should not be forced to use facilities in line with their birth sex, but it is hard to see how treating us as a 'third sex' at work aligns with the privacy protections in the Gender Recognition Act or the Human Rights Act. We must be allowed to transition and move on with our lives with privacy, not be outed every day at work.”

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance@transsolidarity· Feb 11

Thank you to all MPs and staff who joined us in Parliament yesterday to hear about the need to protect inclusion. Have you read the letter we've sent with a coalition of nearly 150 feminist and LGBTQ+ organisations, and will you write your own? transsolidarityalliance.com/protectinclusion