Don Elkay
@theteflondon
Southern Oregon/Idaho.“We the People” means everyone. (he/him)
When your penis is so small that your girlfriend needs a ladder to get in your pickup…
Traffic engineers (who deny it when you suggest their value motorist convenience over safety): The increase in crashes in an acceptable tradeoff for improved efficiencies for our motorist constituents. www.westernite.org/annualmeetin...
Hey, @idahodems.bsky.social: Why don’t you use present-day pictures of Mike Simpson when you promote positions that are counter to his? Put the gerontocracy on full display.
It says a lot that neither a single member of the council nor the Mayor will explain to them that NC allows Adequate Public Facilities Ordinances and the city has chosen to not pursue them. They aren’t easy to enact but can be done within certain parameters. canons.sog.unc.edu/blog/2010/10...
“Protected” bike lane? These are only buffered bike lanes. Flexposts don’t provide protection. They are nothing but vertical paint. How ‘bout some real protection?
There was a time before traffic engineers deemed themselves overlords of the streets when speed limits were based on land use. So, blaming land use for unsafe speeds seems to be misguided since it was the traffic engineers who misled the public by applying the rural 85th %ile metric to urban streets
Ain’t that America something to see? @actfortransit.bsky.social @thismachinekillsfascists.bike @keawilson.bsky.social kobi5.com/news/local-n...
It’s especially striking when they are located at an 80 mph speed limit sign and Montana DOT’s response to all the deaths on their highways is: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Oregon DOT has claimed for years that they are bicyclist & pedestrian friendly. It plays well at conferences because they don’t show you pics like these. In reality, they aren’t much different than the other 49 state DOTs. It’s still an agency where motorist convenience trumps safety.
Motorists never have to advocate for a convenience-driven road widening project or obtain 75% of property owner approval for it. But when residents want a safer street, agencies (who swear safety is their top priority) force them to jump through all kinds of hoops. Neighbors here want a road diet.
When you land in Chicago and the 40-minute taxi route makes you wonder if the gate is in Gary…
None of these vertical elements negates pedestrian mobility, but does protect against errant motorists.
The data needs updating, but from 2000 to 2014 more than $700 million was spent widening highways in the Boise region. These expenditures only served to increase congestion, with a $330 annual increase in congestion costs per driver and 9 hours a year increase in time spent in congestion.
Today’s wildfire map, just in case anyone is doubting that we’ve reached a point of no return on climate change.
I think this is a a pic of it from back when it was fresh. I have been using it in presentations to show how engineers don’t really care about making bicycling facilities safe or usable.
It’s a bike lane in name only. No bicyclist concerned for their safety would use that.
It also says a lot that the Times allowed the author to provide their own title like this, projecting the idea that the author is informed and knowledgeable about the subject matter. I’m sure their toilet seat has a massive depression in it from all that ✌️research✌️.
Hopefully they address how companies like Lime create ADA violations when they either place micromobility devices on a sidewalk for marketing or when a user leaves one on a sidewalk (creating a protruding object). These are a licensed “city program” in most places and cities are liable under ADA.
Here’s the AI-generated reply they gave a citizen. One for the @wesmars.bsky.social files!
What is this thing that is impeding the turning space within the ramp landing on the opposite side?
@bethosborne.bsky.social @visionzeronet.bsky.social @usa.streetsblog.org @kenmcld.bsky.social Here’s one for when AASHTO says they are committed to safety. A member DOT (Idaho) is demanding removal of Leading Pedestrian Intervals from all state-owned signals managed by the highway district in Boise.
Advocates call pedestrian flags “safety theater.” They give the appearance that an agency cares about safety without them actually improving safety. Even with these flags, inequity appears, as one of these new sets is in a wealthy neighborhood and the other is not. I’ll let you guess which is which.
Hopefully someone pointed out to them that the curb ramp and pushbutton don’t comply with ADA requirements.